deadline for submissions:Â
August 1, 2024
full name / name of organization:Â
Nathaniel Hawthorne Review
contact email:Â
New Perspectives on Hawthorne and Utopia
Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, Spring, 2025
Editors: Monika Elbert and Andrew Loman
In The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne writes, “The founders of a new colony, whatever Utopia of human virtue and happiness they might originally project, have invariably found it among their earliest practical necessities to allot a portion of the virgin soil as a cemetery, and another portion as the site of a prison” (CE 1:47). This famous sentence deploys a number of key terms – the colony, virtue, happiness, projection, necessity, virginity, the cemetery, the prison – all of them interlinked with the sentence’s key term, Utopia.
Utopianism is a major topic in Hawthorne’s writing, generally. His fiction teems with would-be
Utopias, from Blithedale to the Hall of Fantasy to the new Adam and Eve’s post-cataclysmic
Boston. The horrors of a utopian spirit run riot are shown starkly in “Earth’s Holocaust.” Literary form itself is implicated in utopianism, the Romance as Hawthorne defines it a kind of textual no-place “having a great deal more to do with the clouds overhead than with any portion of the actual soil” (CE 2:3). And Hawthorne’s stay at Brook Farm made him somewhat of a Realist, as we see his disenchantment in letters to his betrothed, Sophia.
 Hawthorne developed his Utopian thematics in a tumultuous era of American history. His career spanned four decades of Indigenous genocide caused by American expansion, unfolded alongside intensifying debates over the place of slavery in America, and overlapped with reform movements focused on carceral utopias like the penitentiary and the asylum. Prison and asylum reform were themselves part of an array of reform movements, notable among them the communitarianism that led to Brook Farm. There is also the influence of foreign utopian thinking, as in the socialist utopian movement wrought by Charles Fourier and examined by Andrew Loman in conjunction with Hawthorne’s utopian thinking in Loman’s ground-breaking study:  Somewhat on the Community System: Representations of Fourierism in the Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne (Routledge, 2005). In markedly different ways, all of these contexts inform Hawthorne’s fiction.
We read Hawthorne’s writing today at a similarly fraught historical moment, with a climate
emergency at hand and with various ethnic nationalisms, animated by their own strain of
utopianism, resurgent both in America and elsewhere. Our contemporary vantage permits new
readings of Hawthorne and his fiction. To this end, the Nathaniel Hawthorne Review invites
submissions for a special issue that considers utopianism in Hawthorne’s fiction and/or in his personal writing (letters, Notebooks entries) especially in relation to nineteenth-century and twenty-first century contexts. We encourage a wide variety of theoretical and methodological approaches.
Topics might include:
Hawthorne, America, and Utopia
Utopianism in the Short Fiction
The Romance as Aesthetic Utopia
Hawthorne and the Carceral Utopia
Utopia and Settler Colonialism
Gender and Utopia
Hawthorne, Utopia, and Ecology
Utopianism and Apocalypticism
Utopianism and Racial Ideology
The outsider in Hawthorne’s utopias
Religion and Hawthorne’s utopian writing
Views of gender relations in Hawthorne’s utopian writing
Family or love relationships in Hawthorne’s utopian writing
Gothic utopianism
Hawthorne’s Brook Farm portrayal and nineteenth-century descriptions of other would-be utopias (e.g., Louisa May Alcott and “Transcendental Wild Oats”; or the influence of Charles Fourier’s thinking on Hawthorne’s Blithedale)
Date for Abstracts: 250-400 words, August 1, 2024
Date for Full Drafts:Â January 15, 2025
Queries are welcome. Please send abstracts to:
Dr. Monika Elbert, Montclair State Univ.   elbertm@montclair.edu
and to Dr. Andrew Loman, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland      aloman@mun.ca
